EREFS Endoscopic Reference Score (Eosinophilic Esophagitis)

The EREFS ENDOSCOPIC REFERENCE SCORE (Hirano and colleagues 2013) grades five endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Open the calculator → Runs in your browser. Data leaves only if you deliberately send a problem report from the interactive tool.

Example

Proximal esophagus - Edema
1
Proximal esophagus - Rings
1
Proximal esophagus - Exudates
0
Proximal esophagus - Furrows
1
Proximal esophagus - Stricture
0
Distal esophagus - Edema
1
Distal esophagus - Rings
2
Distal esophagus - Exudates
1
Distal esophagus - Furrows
1
Distal esophagus - Stricture
0

Result: 8

The tool opens with these values already filled in. Replace them with your own.

What the result means

Regions
PROXIMAL AND DISTAL ARE SCORED SEPARATELY: 0 to 9 each, 0 to 18 overall. Reporting one regional score as "the EREFS" halves the scale.
Edema
0 absent; 1 present - loss of normal vascular markings, pallor or decreased transparency.
Rings
0 absent; 1 mild; 2 moderate; 3 severe. The descriptors for mild, moderate and severe differ between renderings and are not asserted here.
Exudates
0 absent; 1 mild, under 10% of the mucosal surface; 2 severe, 10% or more.
Furrows
0 absent; 1 mild; 2 severe. One rendering gives only absent/present; two give three grades.
Stricture
0 absent; 1 present. PRESENT-OR-ABSENT ONLY - the least granular item, worth the same single point as edema while rings get four grades.
Weighting
The five features have DIFFERENT maxima and are not equally weighted: 1, 3, 2, 2, 1 - nine points per region.
Which score
AMBIGUOUS: three composites are published from the same features - full (0-18), inflammatory excluding rings and stricture (0-10), and modified presence-or-absence (0-10). All three are returned.
Bands
NONE are validated and none is returned. The instrument is used as a trial endpoint by CHANGE from a patient own baseline.
Scope
Describes appearance. Does NOT diagnose - that needs a biopsy eosinophil count, and a normal-looking esophagus can still be histologically active.
Limits
Does not measure symptoms or dysphagia, and decides no dilation, diet elimination, topical steroid or biologic therapy.

What you enter

  • Proximal esophagus - Edema.
  • Proximal esophagus - Rings.
  • Proximal esophagus - Exudates.
  • Proximal esophagus - Furrows.
  • Proximal esophagus - Stricture.
  • Distal esophagus - Edema.
  • Distal esophagus - Rings.
  • Distal esophagus - Exudates.
  • Distal esophagus - Furrows.
  • Distal esophagus - Stricture.
Full field descriptions
  • Proximal esophagus - Edema [0 = Absent; 1 = Present - loss of normal vascular markings, pallor or decreased transparency]. Contributes up to 1 point in this region.
  • Proximal esophagus - Rings [0 = Absent; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe]. Contributes up to 3 points in this region.
  • Proximal esophagus - Exudates [0 = Absent; 1 = Mild - under 10% of the mucosal surface; 2 = Severe - 10% or more of the mucosal surface]. Contributes up to 2 points in this region.
  • Proximal esophagus - Furrows [0 = Absent; 1 = Mild; 2 = Severe]. Contributes up to 2 points in this region.
  • Proximal esophagus - Stricture [0 = Absent; 1 = Present]. Contributes up to 1 point in this region.
  • Distal esophagus - Edema [0 = Absent; 1 = Present - loss of normal vascular markings, pallor or decreased transparency]. Contributes up to 1 point in this region.
  • Distal esophagus - Rings [0 = Absent; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe]. Contributes up to 3 points in this region.
  • Distal esophagus - Exudates [0 = Absent; 1 = Mild - under 10% of the mucosal surface; 2 = Severe - 10% or more of the mucosal surface]. Contributes up to 2 points in this region.
  • Distal esophagus - Furrows [0 = Absent; 1 = Mild; 2 = Severe]. Contributes up to 2 points in this region.
  • Distal esophagus - Stricture [0 = Absent; 1 = Present]. Contributes up to 1 point in this region.
How this is calculated

Hirano I, Moy N, Heckman MG, Thomas CS, Gonsalves N, Achem SR. Endoscopic assessment of the oesophageal features of eosinophilic oesophagitis: validation of a novel classification and grading system. Gut. 2013;62(4):489-495. Read the source ↗

A reference and educational tool. Not medical, legal, or financial advice, and not a substitute for clinician judgment.

Browse all tools

Built by Clay Good. Source on GitHub.